Insurance Advisory
Senior actuarial support for financial reporting, capital, pricing, reserving and model governance—combining technical depth with clear, practical recommendations.
Two practical starting points
Each flagship engagement is bounded around a defined management need. Scope and depth are adapted to the organization, jurisdiction and available evidence.
Examine how an established IFRS 17 process is performing and identify the improvements that will make reporting more efficient, controlled and easier to explain.
Independently challenge the way risk and capital assessments are designed, governed, documented and used in management decisions.
Core capabilities
Explore a specific capability directly, or begin with a flagship review when the challenge cuts across several functions or processes.
Reporting performance, methodology, controls, reconciliations, model changes and management explanations.
Explore IFRS 17Risk and capital assessment, scenarios, internal models, governance, documentation and management use.
Explore solvency servicesIndependent analysis, model enhancement, assumption review, portfolio monitoring and technical challenge.
Explore pricing and reservingRisk frameworks, model governance, documentation, validation, controls and decision integration.
Explore ERM and governanceWhen clients call
Recurring manual intervention, difficult reconciliations or controls that create effort without sufficient insight.
Management needs independent challenge of assumptions, implications, validation and governance.
Findings need to be translated into proportionate actions, ownership and a credible remediation sequence.
Technical outputs need a clearer connection with business drivers, uncertainty and management response.
How A&A works
The work is proportionate to the decision. It combines actuarial depth, structured challenge and clear communication with the people who own the process and its outcomes.
Engagements are adapted to the applicable Swiss, European or Latin American context rather than treating regulatory frameworks as interchangeable.
Clarify the management need, scope, evidence, stakeholders and definition of a useful outcome.
Assess methods, results, assumptions, documentation, processes and controls at the agreed depth.
Distinguish material weaknesses from lower-value refinements and explain the implications.
Prioritize actions, ownership, dependencies and an achievable implementation sequence.
Start with the decision
A short initial discussion can determine whether a focused review or specialist engagement is the appropriate starting point.
