Model interpretability
Use global and local techniques—including feature importance, partial dependence and attribution—to understand patterns, individual predictions and limitations.
Make model behaviour understandable, challengeable and appropriate for the decisions it is expected to influence.
Clarity before consequence
Explainability is not a chart added after model development. A useful explanation must clarify what drives a prediction, where the model may be unreliable, how its behaviour varies across segments and what a decision-maker should do with the output.
Arocha & Associates combines actuarial judgement, statistical interpretation and governance design to make complex models more transparent to developers, validators, management and oversight functions.
Support can focus on one model or decision, or establish a proportionate explainability framework across a wider model portfolio.
Core support
Use global and local techniques—including feature importance, partial dependence and attribution—to understand patterns, individual predictions and limitations.
Examine performance and outcomes across relevant groups, test proxies and sensitivities, and distinguish statistical differences from decision concerns.
Define the explanation evidence, limitations, approvals, escalation and ongoing monitoring required for the intended use and level of model risk.
Different audiences, different questions
Which features, interactions, edge cases and data limitations shape model behaviour?
When should the model influence a decision, and when is human judgement required?
Is the explanation faithful, reproducible and sufficient to support challenge and approval?
A decision-centred review
The work links model behaviour with the decision context, affected stakeholders, evidence requirements and governance response.
Define the model use, audience, materiality and explanation questions.
Analyse drivers, interactions, segments, errors, stability and limitations.
Create faithful narratives and visual evidence suited to each audience.
Document use conditions, human oversight, monitoring and escalation.
Typical outcomes
Start with the explanation gap
We can assess the current explanation evidence, identify the material gaps and design a proportionate approach to interpretation and oversight.